Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Manager's Guide to Surgery's Ambulatory Anesthesia - July 2015

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/538156

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 68

8 S U P P L E M E N T T O O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E J U LY 2 0 1 5 ure out the best dose of Exparel, compared the drug at several dose levels to bupivacaine HCl 150 mg. The researchers found no appreciable differences in visual analog pain scores until they cranked up the dosage of Exparel to 533 mg, more than double the dosage of the control. At that level, Exparel patients expe- rienced a very high level of adverse events — 78% experienced nausea, 48% experienced hemorrhagic anemia and 20% experienced anemia. Exparel's ulti- mate approval was for no more than 20 mL, or 266 mg, and that is what comes in each $285 vial. A study of 136 breast augmentation patients randomized to bupivacaine or Exparel appears to have produced a slight edge for Exparel in a measurement called "area under the curve." Exparel patients' pain scores were about 6% lower than bupivacaine's, but the authors admit that the study was "underpow- ered." And in the study, Exparel test subjects received a 300 mg dose, whereas bupivacaine controls received only a 100 mg dose. "These were not robust trial results," says an anesthesiologist with knowledge of Exparel's development program who spoke on the condition of anonymity, "and a number of trials had negative findings." With Phase 2 complete, the company moved on to Phase 3 studies, which it would use to prove safety and efficacy to the FDA. Unlike most earlier studies, FDA reviewers vetted the results of these studies. Here are the 3 studies and what they found: • A study pitting Exparel against saline in hemorrhoidectomy surgery found that Exparel was more effective than saline at controlling pain for up to 24 hours, at which point its efficacy was indistinguishable from placebo. "The anal- gesia derived from Exparel does not differ from placebo, at least not in a clini- cally meaningful way, beyond 24 hours," wrote FDA reviewer Arthur Simone, MD, PhD. • A study pitting Exparel against saline in bunionectomy surgery found that Exparel was more effective than saline for 12 hours. Somewhere between 12 and 24 hours, the differences became statistically insignificant. Both Exparel and

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Manager's Guide to Surgery's Ambulatory Anesthesia - July 2015