Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Special Edition: Staff & Patient Safety - October 2020 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/1295125

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 43

defect is often upstream — even in the office that produced the consent form. Errors can occur in the OR if notes from surgeons' offices are incor- rect or include last-minute changes, or if the order of the patients in the OR schedule changes without the care team being notified. Put a process in place to confirm the correct patient, procedure and sur- gical site are noted on consent forms, the surgical schedule and pre-op paperwork before patients arrive for surgery. • Mark the surgical site. The area where we see the most variability is during the time-out process because it's highly dependent on workflow (more on that later), but there are also inconsistencies in terms of who marks the site and how they do it. It's imperative to establish standards that are clear and unambiguous. However, the vari- ability surrounding site marking can be problematic. For example, if certain team members are used to one convention for site-mark- ing, but then move to a different facility where the standards are completely different, there is more room for error. Additionally, a surgeon might mark the surgical site with their initials, with a check mark or by circling the area — it really comes down to their facility's policy. The most com- mon policy requires surgeons to mark sites with their initials. There are clear recommenda- tions from patient safety experts that surgeons should never write "no" on the incorrect site. They should mark only the site they're going to work on because mark- ing another area could create unnecessary confusion. Yes, it certainly would be easi- er if there were a national consen- sus surrounding site-marking. Still, you can greatly reduce potential issues by establishing a single process that is well-known and understood by every surgeon and staff member — and making sure it's consistently enforced. Site-marking should occur in pre-op holding and should be 1 2 • S U P P L E M E N T T O O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E • O C T O B E R 2 0 2 0 Putting protocols in place to prevent wrong-site surgery might require a few organizational modifications. Start with these essential steps. • Encourage organizational leadership. Promote behaviors that support a culture of safety and teamwork, which includes engagement of the whole team — including the patient and the family — and appropriate staffing and workflow. • Promote staff engagement. Establish "good catch" pro- grams and an anonymous incident reporting system where staff are rewarded for entering unsafe conditions, which could include a time-out when the team wasn't engaged in the process. These methods are not meant to be used as a punitive way to get colleagues in trouble, but rather to coach staff mem- bers and use an incident as a moment of learning before it becomes a problem. • Be transparent. Transparency should be a key value within a healthcare organization. Staff should be encouraged to speak up anytime they witness an error or an unsafe condition. —Edward Pollak, MD HUDDLE UP Promote behaviors that support a culture of safety and teamwork. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Confirm the Correct Site Every Time

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Special Edition: Staff & Patient Safety - October 2020 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine